Difference between revisions of "Math"
(→Other Methods: Adding mathalign page) 
(Added link to math structures) 

Line 1:  Line 1:  
−  < [[Main Page]]  [[Math with newmat]]  [[MathML]] >  +  < [[Main Page]]  [[Math with newmat]]  [[MathML]]  [[Math_structures]]> 
== Introduction ==  == Introduction ==  
Line 243:  Line 243:  
== Other Methods ==  == Other Methods ==  
* There are two different math modules on [http://dante.ctan.org/texarchive/macros/context/contrib/maths/ CTAN], [[Math with nathnath]] and [[Math with amslamsl]].  * There are two different math modules on [http://dante.ctan.org/texarchive/macros/context/contrib/maths/ CTAN], [[Math with nathnath]] and [[Math with amslamsl]].  
−  * Context now has inbuilt support for [[  +  * Context now has inbuilt support for [[Math_structures]] 
* It is also possible to use most [[LaTeX Math in ConTeXtLaTeX equations in ConTeXt]] with a relatively small set of supporting definitions.  * It is also possible to use most [[LaTeX Math in ConTeXtLaTeX equations in ConTeXt]] with a relatively small set of supporting definitions.  
* The "native" ConTeXt way of math is [[MathML]], an application of [[XML]]  rather verbose but mighty.  * The "native" ConTeXt way of math is [[MathML]], an application of [[XML]]  rather verbose but mighty. 
Revision as of 21:56, 8 February 2006
< Main Page  Math with newmat  MathML  Math_structures>
Contents
Introduction
TeX was designed for ease of typesetting books that contained mathematics. As ConTeXt is built on top of TeX, it inherits all those features. In addition to these, ConTeXt adds lot of macros to make the typesetting of mathematics easier.
Simple Math
Typesetting mathematics can be divided into two parts, inline math (mathematical formulas set within ordinary paragraphs as part of the text) and display math mathematics set on lines by themselves, often with equation numbers). Inline math consists of maths that is typed in a sentence. For example
There are two ways of typing inline math. The TeX was is to surround what you want to type within $
...$
. Thus, the above will be typed as
Pythagoras formula, stating $a^2 + b^2 = c^2$ was one of the first trignometric results
ConTeXt also provides an alternative way of typing the same result. Instead of dollars, you can write the material for maths inside \\mathematics. Thus, an alternate way to type the above is,
Pythagoras formula, stating \mathematics{a^2 + b^2 = c^2} was one of the first trignometric results
Choose the method that suits your style. (I do not know if there are pros and cons of $..$ vs \mathematics{}. If someone knows, then please elaborate  aditya )
Display math is enclosed in a \startformula / \stopformula pair. Thus
The famous result (once more) is given by \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2. \stopformula 
This, when typeset, produces the following:

Numbering Formula
ConTeXt provides an easy way to number the display maths equations. Simply, put \placeformula before \startformula / \stopformula pair and you will get numbered equations. Thus,
The famous result (once more) is given by \placeformula \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2. \stopformula 
This, when typeset, produces the following:

The \placeformula command is optional, and produces the equation number; leaving it off produces an unnumbered equation.
Not so Simple Maths
ConTeXt's base mathematics support is built on the mathematics support in plain TeX, thus allowing quite complicated formulas. (There are also some additional macros, such as the \text command for textmode notes within math.) For instance:
A more complicated equation: \placeformula \startformula {{\theta_{\text{\CONTEXT}}}^2 \over x+2} = \pmatrix{a_{11}&a_{12}&\ldots&a_{1n}\cr a_{21}&a_{22}&\ldots&a_{2n}\cr \vdots&\vdots&\ddots&\vdots\cr a_{n1}&a_{n2}&\ldots&a_{nn}\cr} \pmatrix{b_1 \cr b_2 \cr \vdots \cr b_n} + \sum_{j=1}^\infty z^j \left( \sum_{\scriptstyle n=1 \atop \scriptstyle n \ne j}^\infty Z_j^n \right) \stopformula
which produces
Here you can try it "live" (you must go to login first).
MathAlignment is covered on a separate page.
SubFormula Numbering
As mentioned above, formulas can be numbered using the \placeformula command. This (and the related \placesubformula command have an optional argument which can be used to produce subformula numbering. For example:
Examples: \placeformula{a} \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \placesubformula{b} \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula 

What's going on here is simpler than it might appear at first glance. Both \placeformula and \placesubformula produce equation numbers with the optional tag added at the end; the sole difference is that the former increments the equation number first, while the latter does not (and thus can be used for the second and subsequent formulas that use the same formula number but presumably have different tags).
This is sufficient for cases where the standard ConTeXt equation numbers suffice, and where only one equation number is needed per formula. However, there are many cases where this is insufficient, and \placeformula defines \formulanumber and \subformulanumber commands, which provide hooks to allow the use of ConTeXtmanaged formula numbers with plain TeX equation numbering. These, when used within a formula, simply return the formula number in properly formatted form, as can be seen in this simple example with plain TeX's \eqno. Note that the optional tag is inherited from \placeformula.
More examples: \placeformula{c} \startformula \let\doplaceformulanumber\empty c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \eqno{\formulanumber} \stopformula 

In order for this to work properly, we need to turn off ConTeXt's automatic formula number placement; thus the \let command to empty \doplaceformulanumber, which must be placed after the start of the formula. In many practical examples, however, this is not necessary; ConTeXt redefines \displaylines and \eqalignno to do this automatically.
For more control over subformula numbering, \formulanumber and \subformulanumber have an optional argument parallel to that of \placeformula, as demonstrated in this use of plain TeX's \eqalignno, which places multiple equation numbers within one formula.
Yet more examples: \placeformula \startformula \eqalignno{c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber{a} \cr a^2 + b^2 &= c^2 &\subformulanumber{b} \cr d^2 &= e^2 &\formulanumber\cr} \stopformula 

Note that both \formulanumber and \subformulanumber can be used within the same formula, and the formula number is incremented as expected. Also, if an optional argument is specified in both \placefigure and \formulanumber, the latter takes precedence.
More examples for leftlocated equation number: \setupformulas[location=left] \placeformula{d} \startformula \let\doplaceformulanumber\empty c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \leqno{\formulanumber} \stopformula and \placeformula \startformula \leqalignno{c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber{a} \cr a^2 + b^2 &= c^2 &\subformulanumber{b} \cr d^2 &= e^2 &\formulanumber\cr} \stopformula 

 23:46, 15 Aug 2005 (CEST) Prinse Wang
Other Methods
 There are two different math modules on CTAN, nath and amsl.
 Context now has inbuilt support for Math_structures
 It is also possible to use most LaTeX equations in ConTeXt with a relatively small set of supporting definitions.
 The "native" ConTeXt way of math is MathML, an application of XML  rather verbose but mighty.
 And there's a new math module in the distribution.
Number Formatting
There's a special command, \digits, and a own manual about formatting numbers, see Pasting digits together
Math Fonts
 Bold Math
 Euler in ConTeXt (using Euler math font) by Adam Lindsay