Difference between revisions of "Talk:ISO-8859-15"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(you probably can't make the example work here) |
(Comments on getting the example to work.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's unfair to complain about the ''broken'' wiki functionality. The file is about input encoding and wiki works with utf-8 - I can't imagine how to make this example work here even if you include all the necessary definitions. --[[User:Mojca Miklavec|Mojca]] | It's unfair to complain about the ''broken'' wiki functionality. The file is about input encoding and wiki works with utf-8 - I can't imagine how to make this example work here even if you include all the necessary definitions. --[[User:Mojca Miklavec|Mojca]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Good point. The way to make the example "work" is probably to fake it using utf-8 code inside the context block. Incidentally, do the texcode examples look right to you? On my computer, the special characters look all wrong, and I'm wondering if it's font issues or if they're really Latin-9 characters being displayed (incorrectly) as utf-8. (I thought that they were the latter, in which case it wouldn't be too surprising for the example to work properly....) In any case, I'd fake up an output example, except that I don't know what it's supposed to show. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 02:13, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:15, 4 September 2005
It's unfair to complain about the broken wiki functionality. The file is about input encoding and wiki works with utf-8 - I can't imagine how to make this example work here even if you include all the necessary definitions. --Mojca
- Good point. The way to make the example "work" is probably to fake it using utf-8 code inside the context block. Incidentally, do the texcode examples look right to you? On my computer, the special characters look all wrong, and I'm wondering if it's font issues or if they're really Latin-9 characters being displayed (incorrectly) as utf-8. (I thought that they were the latter, in which case it wouldn't be too surprising for the example to work properly....) In any case, I'd fake up an output example, except that I don't know what it's supposed to show. --Brooks 02:13, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
