Difference between revisions of "Talk:Inside ConTeXt"

From Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros.  
 
It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros.  
 
How about [[Commands::getparameters]] et. al. ? Or [[\getparameters]] ?
 
How about [[Commands::getparameters]] et. al. ? Or [[\getparameters]] ?
 +
* yes, it would make much sense, but not in here. We should add them to texshow*, so they would be available not only to the online users but also to etexshow and perhaps other xml based texshow out there.
 +
** who does the job? The commands have to be given in an xml format, wich is not that trivial (but not complex either)
 +
** how do we keep the user interface of texshow(-whatever) clean? I would have to program some kind of filter based on keywords -  but I wanted to do this anyway :-)
 +
** I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now
 +
--[[User:Patrick Gundlach|Patrick Gundlach]] 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)

Revision as of 09:14, 5 August 2004

It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros. How about Commands::getparameters et. al. ? Or \getparameters ?

  • yes, it would make much sense, but not in here. We should add them to texshow*, so they would be available not only to the online users but also to etexshow and perhaps other xml based texshow out there.
    • who does the job? The commands have to be given in an xml format, wich is not that trivial (but not complex either)
    • how do we keep the user interface of texshow(-whatever) clean? I would have to program some kind of filter based on keywords - but I wanted to do this anyway :-)
    • I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now

--Patrick Gundlach 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)