Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(99 pages and still growing)
Line 1: Line 1:
[comment deleted --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]]
+
== reaching 100th page ==
----
 
  
Cool. Patrick, IMO it would be good if you create [[http://www.contextgarden.net www.contextgarden.net]] as an index page for all of the separate subdomains. You have so many now that it would be nice to have an overview.
+
If you have a look at [[Special:Statistics]], we now have 99 pages! Great! Without all your effort, this would not be the case. Who is going to create the 100th page?
  
[[User:Taco|Taco]] 10:04, 24 Aug 2004 (CEST)
+
Thanks to all the authors,
* Good suggestion. for a start I'll add the subdomains on the navigation bar. I won't be home the next few days, so all work will take some time (as usual). But I'll think about a main page at www.contextgarden.net --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]
 
----
 
I have changed the appearance of the <tt>pre</tt> element; the lines were sticking together in my browser (safari). I hope I didn't break any other browsers' appearance. And I have added a simple TeX prettyprinter. See [[Help:Editing]] for a description (where else should I describe the new features?)
 
: [[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]] 12:00, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 
----
 
The lineheight of <tt>pre</tt> is now a bit loose for me, but not so much so that it is actually irritating in Gecko-based stuff (Mozilla 1.7.2 &co). In konqueror (Khtml) it looks worse, but that's more or less normal for me (I have font problems). Someone else should check.
 
  
That new prettyprinter does wonders for the Changes page. Much easier on they brain now.
+
[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]
--[[User:Taco|Taco]] 15:07, 25 Aug 2004 (CEST)
 
  
* Perhaps the line height is different on the pages where <tt>texcode</tt> is included in the <tt>small</tt> element? In http://sandbox.contextgarden.net/Changes there is no <tt>small</tt> element, as opposed to [[Changes]]. Hmm, I just looked at the pages with Camino (gecko) and IE 5 (mac) - and I am not statisfied. --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]] 
+
(old comments deleted, was this a mistake?)
 
 
== pretty printing ==
 
 
 
* the actual '''texcode''' pretty printer doesn't handle \\ correctly, see <pre>one\\two</pre> vs. <texcode>one\\two</texcode>
 
* a pretty printer for XML would be nice!
 
--[[User:Hraban|Hraban]] 13:21, 2 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
: OK, I have fixed <tt>texcode</tt>, and an xml prettyprinter is on my todo list... [[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]] 23:53, 2 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
: xmlcode can be used for xml verbatim text. See [[Image Database]] for an example. OK? [[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]
 
:: Thank you! --[[User:Hraban|Hraban]] 16:47, 12 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
 
 
There '''is''' a pretty printer for xml:
 
 
 
texexec --pdf --use=xml-pretty yourfile.xml
 
 
 
you can call the pretty printer directly (see files) and tune teh output for inline and display elements and such
 
 
 
HH (dunno how to add a signature)
 
 
 
== something to play with ==
 
I have added a wiki<->tex interface. See http://sandbox.contextgarden.net for an example. If this looks stable, I'll put it in the main wiki.
 
: [[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]] 01:07, 8 Sep 2004 (CEST)
 
 
 
Well, no complaints yet. So we can do: <br>
 
<context>
 
\setupcolors [state=start]
 
\framed [background=color,
 
        backgroundcolor=green,
 
          offset=1cm ]{hello world!}
 
</context>
 
 
 
<pre><nowiki>
 
<context>
 
\setupcolors [state=start]
 
\framed [background=color,
 
        backgroundcolor=green,
 
          offset=1cm ]{hello world!}
 
</context>
 
</nowiki></pre>
 
BTW: I'll announce news on contextgarden.net and related stuff on http://news.contextgarden.net/
 
 
 
--[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]
 
: Patrick, would it be possible to enhance this nice feature, so that one can use more than one context-block on a page? (e.g. for samples of different setups) --[[User:Hraban|Hraban]]
 
: Should be fixed; some stupid programming error --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]
 
----
 

Revision as of 09:11, 27 October 2004

reaching 100th page

If you have a look at Special:Statistics, we now have 99 pages! Great! Without all your effort, this would not be the case. Who is going to create the 100th page?

Thanks to all the authors,

pg

(old comments deleted, was this a mistake?)