17
edits
Changes
List of fixed bugs
==Fixed Bugs==
* Remove the bug of numbers >10 [http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20050607.204450.e941be7c.html]
* Fix the <tt>\starttyping</tt> bug [http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20050624.164146.00d3e044.html#20050624.164146.00d3e044]
* Write <tt>\OnSteps</tt> macro to accept input like <tt>\OnSteps[1-3,5,7-9,13-last]</tt>. A part of it is (thanks to Taco!) already here, now only a dash still has to be implemented properly. On the basis of this, FromStep,AfterStep,UntilStep can be rewritten to use the \OnSteps mechanism. Well it would be much better to omit them, but I don't know how much care has to be taken for the "backward compatibility", it's no harm if they are left there.
<texcode>
\def\OnSteps[#1]#2%
{\begingroup
\def\processitem##1{\OnlyStep[##1]{#2}}%
\processcommalist[#1]\processitem
\endgroup}
</texcode>
and the rest of code on [[Inside_ConTeXt#Processing_lists_of_values]]
* Remove the bug of numbers >10 [http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20050607.204450.e941be7c.html]
* Fix the <tt>\starttyping</tt> bug [http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20050624.164146.00d3e044.html#20050624.164146.00d3e044]
* Write <tt>\OnSteps</tt> macro to accept input like <tt>\OnSteps[1-3,5,7-9,13-last]</tt>. A part of it is (thanks to Taco!) already here, now only a dash still has to be implemented properly. On the basis of this, FromStep,AfterStep,UntilStep can be rewritten to use the \OnSteps mechanism. Well it would be much better to omit them, but I don't know how much care has to be taken for the "backward compatibility", it's no harm if they are left there.
<texcode>
\def\OnSteps[#1]#2%
{\begingroup
\def\processitem##1{\OnlyStep[##1]{#2}}%
\processcommalist[#1]\processitem
\endgroup}
</texcode>
and the rest of code on [[Inside_ConTeXt#Processing_lists_of_values]]