419
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Comparison between ConTeXt and other typesetting programs (view source)
Revision as of 17:13, 18 June 2019
, 17:13, 18 June 2019no edit summary
* using LaTeX, an oar is provided and there're lots of nifty customizations and improvements already available, and one can impress additional oars from CTAN, however on a semi-random basis, adding one oar will break other oars, sometimes leaving one adrift or run aground. One can enchant a set of oars to accomplish a given journey, easing the piloting requirement, and the navigation charts are decent and obstacles are fairly well-known.
* using ConTeXt, a very nice oar is provided, which has lots of customization options, but the navigational charts aren't easily read by a traditionally trained navigator at first, although they are fairly compleat complete and most journey can be carefully worked out, but once one is, it is quite automatic and there's a good auto-pilot option.
