30
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→reaching 100th page
:: Actually, it says "in the spirit of the GNU general public license". This made me suspiciuos, since if it were available under GPL, then why not say so plainly. The sentence as written could imply that it's not formally GPL, but it's "in the spirit", i.e. inspired by GPL. Also, I couldn't find the license text in the distribution. Anyway, that's a suggestion for improvement. [[User:BBB|BBB]] 13:55, 7 Nov 2004 (CET)
::: see the mailinglist archive http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20040628.160854.0c05d1d0.html . If this doesn't help you, please discuss this issue on the list
:::: Well, i can understand the 'spirit' of those gnu licences, but the gory details are beyond me, so that's why i've written down things my way; it permits me to add my own spirit, which boils down to: use it any way you want, as long as you don't mess around with the files in a way that it backfires on me or users.
