Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
850 bytes added ,  00:31, 17 December 2012
no edit summary
Result: Does not compile Does as the command type{subformularnumber} is unknown -> '''Does not work.'''
 
==Suggestion for new syntax==
 
The needs out of existing syntax and my personal experience:
* formulas and subformulas in the same block
* referencing on a subformula does not include automaticly a entry in the list of formulas
*
 
===Block notation: NR===
 
No specific values -> [+] otherwise classic attribute/value [...]
 
Expected numbers: (1.a), nothing, (1.b), (2) and (2.a); with reference on (1) and (1.b); with list entries of (1) -> "System of stuff" and (2.a) -> "Great piece"
 
<texcode>
\placenamedformula[eq:ax=b]{System of stuff}
\startformula \startalign
\NC a \NC \eq b \NR[sublevel={.a}]
\NC c \NC \neq d \NR
\NC \NC \neq f \NR[reference={eq:sub},sublevel={.b}]
\NC \NC \geq g \NR[+]
\NC \NC \leq h \NR[listlabel={Great piece},sublevel={.a}]
\NC \NC \eq i \NR
\stopalign \stopformula
\stopsubformulas
</texcode>
98

edits

Navigation menu