148
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
=Crossref thoughts=
↑ = externer Verweis↗ = interner Verweis=Summary===
{| class=wikitableAll three commands:!"Classic" style* \NR!"New" style* \placeformula|-* \formualanumber |[XYZ]will share the same attributes:|* sublevel (↑XYZmaybe better: formulalevel or just level?) and <br />if directly addressed ↑XYZ|to define and concrete the (sub-)level of the formula|[XYZ, p. 23]|* listlabel (↑XYZ, p. 23maybe textlabel? the numberlabel is still needed) <br />↑XYZ, p. 23,to add a entry in the list of formulas|-|[XYZ, p. 22] and [ABC, p. 22-45]|(↑XYZ, p. 22, and ↑ABC, p. 22-45)|-|||-|||-|Abbildung 2.2|Abbildung 2.2|-|Abbildung 2.2 auf Seite 23|Abbildung 2.2 auf Seite 23|-|(Absatz 2.4.9* reference<br /12 auf Seite 23 bis 2.4.2/10 auf Seite 25)|(↗Absatz 2.4.9/12 auf Seite 23 bis ↗Absatz 2.4.2/10 auf Seite 25)|-|(siehe Abs. 3/21)|(siehe ↗Absatz 3/21)|-|(siehe Absätze 3.1/35 und 3.1/38)>just a classic reference in order to link to it|(siehe Absätze ↗3.1/35 und ↗3so that the syntax is more intuitive during writing.1/38)|-|||-|}
{|class=wikitable! outerleft! left! refprefix! refleft! ref! refright! refsuffix! right! outerright|- valign=topAlso. this way the commands:| (* placesubformula| siehe <br/> Absätze <br/> und <br/> bis* placenamedformula| ↑ <br/> ↗ <br/> [* placenamedsubformula| Abbildung<br/>Absatz<br/>Abs.* startstopsubformulas| XYZ<br/>2.2<br/>2.2 auf Seite 23<br/>2.4.9/12 auf Seite 23<br />2.4.2/10 auf Seite 25<br/>3/21* subformulanumber| , pwill become needless. 23| ]|| )|}
Please do not RED tag other wiki pages.
<div style="border: 3px solid red; background: #ffaaaa; padding: 0.4em;">
<div style="fontsize: 1.3em; fontweight: bold">Warning!</div>
If you consider using ConTeXt for a paper with a proper formula numbering please wait until it is implemented in mkiv. At the moment only a very limited formula numbering is possilbe:
* number formula(s) with a plain number
* number formula(s) with a subnumber
Not possible is at the moment:
* Table of formulas
* Named subformulas
* Mixure of formulas and subformulas in one block
* Reference on a (sub-)formula without having it listed in the Table of formulas
For more details and actual state see mailing list and [http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User_talk:Zenlima Summary of formula numbering problem].
</div>
Hi, I use this page to support my question regarding context and summarize the result. Once a problem is solved I will move that text into the "normal" wiki pages.
=Bug: Layoutchange inside page while duplexmode= A both sided document in which the layout has to switch inside a page works fine with text only content, but as soon "bigger" objects (like a table) are involved the textarea get messedup (?shifted horizontally). In the following example inner and outer margin notes are added to make it more obvious. <texcode> \setuppapersize[A4][A4] \definelayout[WithoutMarginnotes][location={duplex},grid=no,topspace=3cm,height=24cm,backspace=3cm,cutspace=0cm,leftmargin=1cm,leftmargindistance=0.4cm,width=16cm,rightmargindistance=0cm,rightmargin=0cm] \definelayout[WithMarginnotes][location={duplex},grid=no,topspace=3cm,height=24cm,backspace=3cm,cutspace=0cm,leftmargin=1cm,leftmargindistance=0.4cm,width=12.1cm,rightmargindistance=0.4cm,rightmargin=3.5cm] \setuppagenumbering[alternative=doublesided,location=] \starttext \setuplayout[WithMarginnotes] \dorecurse {6} { \ininner[stack=yes]{\expanded{\dorecurse{2}{IM\recurselevel\space}}}% \inouter[stack=yes]{\expanded{\dorecurse{3}{OM\recurselevel\space}}}% \input tufte \par } \setuplayout[WithoutMarginnotes] \placetable[split][]{Big table object} { \setupTABLE[row][1][width=\textwidth] \bTABLE[split=repeat] \bTABLEhead \bTR \bTD XXX \eTD \eTR \eTABLEhead \bTABLEbody \dorecurse{20}{ \bTR \bTD XXX \eTD \eTR} \eTABLEbody \eTABLE } \setuplayout[WithMarginnotes] \dorecurse {3} { \ininner[stack=yes]{\expanded{\dorecurse{2}{IM\recurselevel\space}}}% \inouter[stack=yes]{\expanded{\dorecurse{3}{OM\recurselevel\space}}}% \input tufte \par } \stoptext</texcode> =Bug: Formula numbering- subnumbers and list of formulas= All following example have following frame: <texcode>\usemodule[newmath] \setupformulas[way=bytext,prefix=no]\setupsubformulas[conversion=romannumerals] \starttext...(example placed here)...\stoptext</texcode> ==What works== ===formula=== Expected formular number: (1) <texcode>\placenamedformula[one]{Der einfache Test}\startformulac^2 = a^2 + b^2.\stopformula</texcode> Result: (1) -> '''Works''' ===align - formular [+]=== Expected formular numbers: (1) and (2) <texcode>\placeformula\startformula\startalign[n=3, align={right,middle,left}]\NC PM \xrightarrow \NC R_{PM} \NC \xrightarrow PM \NR[+]\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC \{ A, B, C, D, E\} \NR[+]\stopalign\stopformula</texcode> Result: (1) and (2) -> '''Works''' ===align - subformular [+]=== Expected numbers: (1.a), (1.b), (1.c), (1.d) and reference on (1) and (1.b)<texcode>\startsubformulas[eq:ax=b]\placeformula\startformula \startalign\NC a \NC \eq b \NR[+]\NC c \NC \neq d \NR\NC \NC \neq f \NR[eq:sub]\NC \NC \geq g \NR[+]\NC \NC \leq h \NR[+]\NC \NC \eq i \NR\stopalign \stopformula\stopsubformulas</texcode> Result: (1.a), (1.b), (1.c), (1.d) -> '''Works'''. BUT: Every formula with a reference is automatic listed in the table of formulas (nameless) - at the moment there is no possiblity to have a reference without listing the formula. ===eqalignno - formula=== Taken from wiki and removed the subformulanumber. Expected formular numbers: (1), (2), (3) and (4): <texcode>\placeformula\startformula\eqalignno{ c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber \cr c &= \left(a^2 + b^2\right)^{\vfrac{1}{2}} &\formulanumber\cr a^2 + b^2 &= c^2 &\formulanumber \cr d^2 &= e^2 &\formulanumber \cr}\stopformula</texcode> Result: (1), (2), (3) and (4) -> '''Works''' ==What does not work== ===List of formulas=== <texcode>\placelist[formula][criterium=all,alternative=c]</texcode> The list of formulas seems to be totally out of order. Strange numbering and missing names. Needs more investigation once some of the named formulas constructions are fixed. ===subformula=== Expected formular numbers: (1a) and (1b) <texcode>\startsubformulas[eq:1]\placeformula[eq:first]\startformulaPM \xrightarrow R_{PM} \xrightarrow PM\stopformula \placeformula[eq:second]\startformulaR_{PM} = \{ K, F, Z, U, I, J\}\stopformula\stopsubformulas</texcode> Result: (1a) and nothing -> '''Does not work.''' ===align - formula (subformulas->formulas->formula)=== Expected formular numbers: (1a) and (1a) and a reference to formular (1b) <texcode>\startsubformulas\startformulas\placeformula\startformula\startalign[n=3, align={right,middle,left}]\NC PM \xrightarrow \NC R_{PM} \NC \xrightarrow PM \NR[+]\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC \{ A, B, C, D, E\} \NR[a]\stopalign\stopformula\stopformulas\stopsubformulas</texcode> Result: nothing and nothing -> '''Does not work.''' ===align - subformula=== Expected formular numbers: (1.1), (1.2) and (1.c) plus reference on (1.1) and (1.2) <texcode>\placesubformula\startformula\startalign[n=3, align={right,middle,left}]\NC PM \xrightarrow \NC R_{PM} \NC \xrightarrow PM \NR[gleichung1a][.1]\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC \{ A, B, C, D, E\} \NR[gleichung1b][.2]\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC \{ A, B, C, D, E\} \NR[+][c]\stopalign\stopformula</texcode> Result: (1), (2) and (3) -> '''Does not work.''' Expected formular numbers: (1a) and (1b) plus reference on (1a) and (1b) <texcode>\placesubformula\startformula\startalign[n=3, align={right,middle,left}]\NC PM \xrightarrow \NC R_{PM} \NC \xrightarrow PM \NR[gleichung1a][+]\NC R_{PM} \NC = \NC \{ A, B, C, D, E\} \NR[gleichung1b][]\stopalign\stopformula</texcode> Result: (1) and (2) -> '''Does not work.''' ===eqalignno - subformula=== Directly taken form wiki. Expected formular numbers (1), (1a), (1b) and (2): <texcode>\placeformula\startformula\eqalignno{ c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber{a} \cr c &= \left(a^2 + b^2\right)^{\vfrac{1}{2}} &\subformulanumber{b}\cr a^2 + b^2 &= c^2 &\subformulanumber{c} \cr d^2 &= e^2 &\formulanumber\cr}\stopformula</texcode> Result: Does not compile Does as the command type{subformularnumber} is unknown -> '''Does not work.''' ==Suggestion for new syntax== '''Open for discussion :-)''' The needs out of existing syntax and my personal experience:* formulas and subformulas in the same block* referencing on a subformula does not include automaticly a entry in the list of formulas* simple, block and eqalignno ===Simple=== Expected formular number: (1) and list entry (1) -> "Der einfache Test" <texcode>\placeformula[reference={one},listlabel={Der einfache Test}]\startformulac^2 = a^2 + b^2.\stopformula</texcode> Expected formular number: (1.3) and list entry (1.3) -> "Der einfache Test" <texcode>\placeformula[sublevel={.3},reference={one},listlabel={Der einfache Test}]\startformulac^2 = a^2 + b^2.\stopformula</texcode> ===Block notation: NR=== No specific values -> [+] otherwise classic attribute/value [...] Expected numbers: (1.a), nothing, (1.b), (2), (2.a), nothing and (3); with reference on (1) and (1.b); with list entries of (1) -> "System of stuff", (2.a) -> "Great piece" and (3) -> "Last part" <texcode>\placenamedformula[reference={eq:ax=b},listlabel={System of stuff}]\startformula \startalign\NC a \NC \eq b \NR[sublevel={.a}]\NC c \NC \neq d \NR\NC \NC \neq f \NR[reference={eq:sub},sublevel={.b}]\NC \NC \geq g \NR[+]\NC \NC \leq h \NR[listlabel={Great piece},sublevel={.a}]\NC \NC \eq i \NR\NC \NC \eq i \NR[listlabel={Last part}]\stopalign \stopformula\stopsubformulas</texcode> ===eqalignno=== Expected formular numbers (1), (1a), (1.c) and (2); reference on (2); list entries (1.c) -> "Yea!" and (2) -> "Ups"
<texcode>\placeformula\startformula\eqalignno{ c^2 &= a^2 + b^2 &\formulanumber \cr c &= \left(reviewing the bug atma^2 + b^2\right)^{\vfrac{1}{2}} &\formulanumber[sublevel={a}]\cr a^2 + b^2 &= c^2 &\formulanumber[sublevel={.c},listlabel={Yea!}] \cr d^2 &= e^2 &\formulanumber[listlabel={Ups},reference={eq:ups}]\cr}\stopformula</texcode>
