Changes

Here's a an <b>old</b> wish list for [[User:Patrick Gundlach|the gardner]] :)

* '''Q:''' Are I have been playing a bit with the <code>&lt;context&gt;</code> images rendered using gs? In that case, could rendering. What do you think of [http://www.cssandbox.wisccontextgarden.edunet/~ghostHiding_Content] instead of [http:/doc/cvs/Deviceswiki.contextgarden.htm#PNG <code>-sDEVICE=pngalpha<net/code>Hiding_Content] be used to get transparent images? --pg: '''A:'''I'm not sure yet; it looks sharper, but the sharpening seems a bit uneven compared to the old version. So I don't know whether I prefer "sharper" or "more even". ... After looking at this some more, I think I slightly favor the old version, because it does look more even. On the other hand, the images are a lot smaller on the new version, which is a definite boon on a modem connection! --[[User: [updateBrooks|Brooks]] Done. HowTo now transparent.* '''Q:''' adding <code>&lt;xmlcode&gt;</code> (code highlighter is already written) or, if not too complicated, something more general like <code>&lt;code type="xml"&gt;</code>, <code>&lt;code type="mp"&gt;</code>, ... :'''A:''' This is quite hard I'd guess. Addition: in the new wiki software which I will eventually install (I am currently testing a lot -- MW sofware doesn't behave as expected) will be able to handle those parameters (note for myself: [http://metawww.wikimediamediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_extensions_FAQManual:Tag_extensions#How_can_I_pass_XML-style_parameters_in_my_extension_tag.3F instructions here])* '''Q:''' adding <code>&lt;latex&gt;</code> counterpart to <code>&lt;context&gt;</code>; mostly in order to be able to compare LaTeX and ConTeXt results or to be able to describe the desired result in [[:Category:From LaTeX]] :'''A:''' no problem, would the layout (colors, etc[update] I didn't remember what <code>&lt;context&gt;</code> does...) changeWould we need a multiple pass solution?--[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]:'''A2:''' Brooks seems to like LaTeX, perhaps he can tell more; I don't think really remember how many time one needs to run it. I guess that changing anything is neededwe won't need BibTeX, but I'm not sure if I understand the questionperhaps some proper indexing/cross referencing would be handy. Is running it two times enough? More than three times is probably already to much.--[[User:Mojca Miklavec|Mojca]]* : '''QA3:''' In the "recent changes" pagemost cases, LaTeX really only needs one run. It needs two runs to resolve any references that are referenced before they are created -- which, itfor Wiki examples (which don's often hard t have floats floating to notice the "N" designations ("New page"later pages) is probably likely to be so infrequent as to be unnecessary. It occasionally needs more than two runs, but only in really rare cases, and we definitely won't see those on the midst of a long line of "M" Wiki. So, my answer would be to do two-pass (call "Minor editlatex filename"twice) changes. Would if it be possible 's easy to highlight the "N" in red or something? do, otherwise one-pass is probably sufficient. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]]06:10, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)* '''Q:''' We now have the the <brnowiki>I agree with it. It is possible to hide minor edits, but it would really be better if {{{cmd|command}} template and the <bcmd>Mcommand</bcmd> would become <i>M</inowiki> or if tag. The template works beautifully, although it prints the command in proportional text instead of the rather nice fixed-width font used on this wiki. The latter doesn't work. Would it be possible for the color maintainer to do a wiki-wide find-and-replace of <bnowiki>Ns_<cmd>_{{cmd|_g and s_</cmd>_}}_ ?</bnowiki> would changeIt will make every single page on this wiki hugely more useful in an instant. --[[User:Mojca Miklavec|Mojca]] '''A:''' Done --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]]

* archiving articles there's no "download this article" for MyWay and there's no link to user webpages listed under user pages** I get (if allowedhalf of) or at least adding direct URLs the word back: only [[article:126|this page]] and only some Ways have missing links* a form to themsubmit proposals for new entries