Changes

= General Wiki Comments = == Spam problem ==  Don't worry: How about creating , <a simple field like href="Write `Context' in the textbox" for registeration. It will make it slightly more difficult for the bots, and is not too difficult to implement --[[Userhttp:Adityam|Aditya]] :: if someone sends me a patch against the current mediawiki software//www.babble.com/CS/members/tx1g84. I'd be happy to apply it to this wiki. BTWaspx">young cutie pussy</a>, [url="http: I have blocked the IP-address from where the last stupid edits came from (thanks, Taco, for reverting all those edits)//www. (69babble.205.189.198) ::: There are two options (1) Do not allow user to change anything without loggin in. One can create a pretty vague loginid if hecom/CS/members/she wants to remain anonymoustx1g84. See aspx"]young cutie pussy[/url], http://testwww.wikipediababble.orgcom/CS/wikimembers/Main_Page] You need to create an account to change data and ceate new account gives you a captchatx1g84. I do not have any experience of managing wikimedia. But from what I have read on its documentationsaspx young cutie pussy, it is possible to disable anonymous edits [<a href="http://metaspeakeasy.wikimediacraveonline.orgcom/wikimember.php?u=66635811">gay twinks fucking</Preventing_Access#Disable_anonymous_edits]. However this goes against the spirit of wikis in general.(2) When a person has not logged in>, give him a captcha or a value to fill in a form[url="http://speakeasy. This should be doable manuallycraveonline. The easiest way that I can think of is to check the word with javascript before actually submitting datacom/member. Another way can be to check it within the php script (Don't know enough php to see how to do this). ::: So my question basically boils down to this. Is disabling anonymous post and requiring login (with a captcha) not an option? If so, I will play around with authentication in webforms a little and get back with more specific suggestions. --u=66635811"]gay twinks fucking[[User:Adityam|Aditya]/url] :::: Actually, I went through all the recent changes, and it was vandalism rather than spam. I do not think that there is any way to stop a delibrate deletion of content by a user. http::::: In forum software it is not abnormal to see a system where the first X posts of a user require approval by a moderator//speakeasy. That would work nicely against this sort of vandalism, but I do not have even a remote idea how that would work out on a wikicraveonline. [[User:Taco|Taco]] :::::: Somehow I still think that the best solution is to continue using the spam-blacklist and manual vandalism revertingcom/member. In my opinionphp?u=66635811 gay twinks fucking, this is not that much of <a deal. --[[Userhref="http:Patrick Gundlach|pg]] == GIFs == Is it forbidden to upload GIFs? I wanted to upload one for the Animation page (I'm not sure if that's a good idea anyway; it would be used to get a feeling of what approximately Adobe Reader is capable to do/limited to)/www. I get a warning <i>"livevideo.gifcom/ng1v8e4" is not a recommended image file format.>granny fucks boy</ia>, but then nothing happened any further. --Thanks, [[Userurl="http:Mojca Miklavec|Mojca//www.livevideo.com/ng1v8e4"]granny fucks boy[/url], http://www.livevideo.com/ng1v8e4 granny fucks boy,