Changes

Don= General Wiki Comments = == Spam problem ==  : How about creating a simple field like "Write `Context't worryin the textbox" for registeration. It will make it slightly more difficult for the bots, and is not too difficult to implement --[[User:Adityam|Aditya]] :: , < if someone sends me a href="httppatch against the current mediawiki software... I'd be happy to apply it to this wiki. BTW://www I have blocked the IP-address from where the last stupid edits came from (thanks, Taco, for reverting all those edits). (69.205.babble189.com/CS198) ::: There are two options (1) Do not allow user to change anything without loggin in. One can create a pretty vague loginid if he/members/tx1g84she wants to remain anonymous.aspx">young cutie pussy</a>, See [url="http://wwwtest.babblewikipedia.comorg/CSwiki/members/tx1g84Main_Page] You need to create an account to change data and ceate new account gives you a captcha. I do not have any experience of managing wikimedia.aspx"]young cutie pussyBut from what I have read on its documentations, it is possible to disable anonymous edits [/url], http://wwwmeta.babblewikimedia.comorg/CSwiki/members/tx1g84Preventing_Access#Disable_anonymous_edits]. However this goes against the spirit of wikis in general.aspx young cutie pussy(2) When a person has not logged in, <give him a captcha or a value to fill in a href="http://speakeasyform.craveonlineThis should be doable manually.com/memberThe easiest way that I can think of is to check the word with javascript before actually submitting data.Another way can be to check it within the phpscript (Don't know enough php to see how to do this). ::: So my question basically boils down to this. Is disabling anonymous post and requiring login (with a captcha) not an option?u=66635811">gay twinks fucking</If so, I will play around with authentication in webforms a>, little and get back with more specific suggestions. --[[url="httpUser:Adityam|Aditya]] :::://speakeasyActually, I went through all the recent changes, and it was vandalism rather than spam.craveonlineI do not think that there is any way to stop a delibrate deletion of content by a user.com/member ::::: In forum software it is not abnormal to see a system where the first X posts of a user require approval by a moderator. That would work nicely against this sort of vandalism, but I do not have even a remote idea how that would work out on a wiki.php?u=66635811"[[User:Taco|Taco]gay twinks fucking[/url], http :::::://speakeasySomehow I still think that the best solution is to continue using the spam-blacklist and manual vandalism reverting.craveonlineIn my opinion, this is not that much of a deal.com--[[User:Patrick Gundlach|pg]] == GIFs == Is it forbidden to upload GIFs? I wanted to upload one for the Animation page (I'm not sure if that's a good idea anyway; it would be used to get a feeling of what approximately Adobe Reader is capable to do/memberlimited to).php?u=66635811 gay twinks fucking, I get a warning <a href=i>"http://www.livevideogif" is not a recommended image file format.com/ng1v8e4">granny fucks boy</ai>, but then nothing happened any further. --Thanks, [[url="httpUser://www.livevideo.com/ng1v8e4"Mojca Miklavec|Mojca]granny fucks boy[/url], http://www.livevideo.com/ng1v8e4 granny fucks boy,