Difference between revisions of "Talk:Math"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(nath vs. AMSmath?) |
m (Never mind; problem fixed, so request deleted.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Could someone please explain the differences of nath and AMSmath etc.? | + | Could someone (Giuseppe?) please explain the differences of nath and amsl (AMSmath) etc.? |
AFAIK they are two different modules, and AFAIR there's also a LaTeX-nath, isn't it? | AFAIK they are two different modules, and AFAIR there's also a LaTeX-nath, isn't it? | ||
| − | --[[User:Hraban|Hraban]] | + | --[[User:Hraban|Hraban]] 16:41, 12 Sep 2004 (CEST) |
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example. Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 11 July 2005
Could someone (Giuseppe?) please explain the differences of nath and amsl (AMSmath) etc.? AFAIK they are two different modules, and AFAIR there's also a LaTeX-nath, isn't it? --Hraban 16:41, 12 Sep 2004 (CEST)
Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example. Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --Brooks 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST)
