Difference between revisions of "Talk:Math"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Explanation of Pythagoras's unfortunate demise.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example. Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST) | Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example. Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Discussion: [[User_talk:Zenlima | summary of formula numbering problems]] (comment: unverified) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:44, 12 May 2024
Could someone (Giuseppe?) please explain the differences of nath and amsl (AMSmath) etc.? AFAIK they are two different modules, and AFAIR there's also a LaTeX-nath, isn't it? --Hraban 16:41, 12 Sep 2004 (CEST)
Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example. Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --Brooks 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST)
- Discussion: summary of formula numbering problems (comment: unverified)
